advertisement
22 December 2025
Why do dogs make people feel better just by watching them? And more importantly, does a person’s mood change the way they read canine emotions? A new study from Arizona State University reveals a surprising distortion in how humans perceive dogs’ feelings, and the results challenge long-held assumptions in psychology.
The research, led by Holly G. Molinaro and Clive D.L. Wynne and published in PeerJ, shows that watching videos of dogs improves mood, even when the dogs look uncomfortable or distressed. But the real twist is how people interpret those dogs’ emotions afterward, depending on what dog images they saw moments earlier.
advertisement
Nearly 600 undergraduate students took part in two experiments. Each participant watched short, silent video clips of three dogs, Oliver, Canyon, and Henry, displaying:
Across the board, participants reported feeling better after watching the videos.
That held true even when some of the dogs showed signs of discomfort.
Previous research has shown that petting, walking, or working with dogs in therapy sessions can lift mood. What makes this study unique is that even brief, passive viewing of dogs on screen, with no sound, no direct contact, and no elaborate setting, still reliably improved how people felt.
Dogs, it seems, don’t even need to be physically present to brighten a person’s day.
The biggest surprise emerged in the second experiment.
Participants were first “primed” with emotional images, either happy dogs or distressed dogs, before watching the dog videos. These images successfully altered participants’ moods. However, when they were asked to rate how the video dogs were feeling, something unexpected happened:
This is the opposite of what is typically seen in human-focused psychology experiments.
Psychologists have long documented the “emotional congruence effect”: the tendency for people in a good mood to see the world more positively and those in a bad mood to see things more negatively. But when the emotional content comes from dogs, the mind appears to flip that rule upside down.
Researchers call this pattern a contrast effect. The brain interprets what it sees next as a kind of emotional “opposite” of what came first, but in this study, that occurred specifically within the realm of dog imagery.
When participants first viewed sad or distressed dog images, the dogs in the following videos appeared happier by comparison. When they viewed joyful, happy dog images first, the same video dogs seemed less happy.
Here’s another intriguing detail: when the researchers primed participants with emotional images of people, landscapes, or objects, the contrast effect did not occur.
Only dog photos, not human faces, not nature scenes, not everyday objects, caused people to misread how dogs in the videos were feeling.
The researchers suggest that dog images may activate especially strong emotional and cognitive shortcuts because of the deep bond many humans share with dogs.
advertisement
These findings go beyond the lab. They could affect how dog owners and professionals interpret everyday canine behavior.
Scrolling through certain types of dog content could subtly skew perception:
In other words, the brain might be comparing a real dog’s subtle expressions against extreme examples seen online, rather than evaluating that dog’s emotional state objectively.
Shelter workers, veterinarians, and dog trainers rely heavily on accurately reading canine body language. If their perception can be influenced by dog imagery viewed just before handling a dog, it could affect:
A skewed emotional read, even if unintentional, could lead to choices that don’t fully match the dog’s actual emotional state.
A pet parent who just watched a stream of joyful, high-energy dog videos might assume their own dog is unhappy when that dog is perfectly calm and content. On the other hand, someone exposed to upsetting dog stories might underestimate their dog’s anxiety or stress, because the dog looks “fine by comparison.”
None of this happens consciously. It’s a subtle, automatic contrast effect, but it may influence how people respond to their pets.
The research involved undergraduate students, mostly aged 18 to 21, and used only three individual dogs across nine videos. More research with a broader range of participants, breeds, and behaviors would help clarify the robustness of this effect.
Still, the study raises important questions about how accurately humans can read dogs’ emotions, especially after exposure to emotionally charged dog imagery online or in the media.
One encouraging takeaway is clear: dogs tend to make people feel better, even through a screen. The mood-boosting effect remained, even when the clips included mild canine discomfort.
advertisement
This Arizona State University study reveals an unexpected nuance in the human–dog bond:
In short, dogs change how people feel and how they think in surprisingly complex ways.
As scientists continue to explore why this happens, one thing remains certain: the human–dog relationship is more profound, more emotional, and more psychologically intricate than many ever imagined.
advertisement
advertisement